PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.40%
Negative revenue growth while 3606.HK stands at 8.79%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.04%
Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 6.73%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.66%
Negative EBIT growth while 3606.HK is at 14.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-49.68%
Negative operating income growth while 3606.HK is at 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
600.81%
Positive net income growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
542.31%
EPS growth of 542.31% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
542.31%
Diluted EPS growth of 542.31% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
12.62%
Slight or no buybacks while 3606.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
12.62%
Diluted share change of 12.62% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-89.20%
Dividend reduction while 3606.HK stands at 5746.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-90.38%
Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-143.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
34936.19%
10Y CAGR of 34936.19% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
16839.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 152.81%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
11.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 3606.HK's 59.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-62.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
283.50%
Positive OCF/share growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-96.14%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
204.83%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 204.83% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
59.56%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3606.HK's 102.75%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-27.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK is 61.94%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.98%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 3606.HK invests at 253.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 3606.HK shows 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-32.62%
Inventory is declining while 3606.HK stands at 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-6.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
6.12%
50-75% of 3606.HK's 10.43%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
62.93%
Debt growth far above 3606.HK's 2.59%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.04%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.