PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.53%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 3606.HK's 1.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
1.99%
Positive gross profit growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.80%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
7.56%
Positive net income growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.45%
Positive EPS growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.52%
Share change of 0.52% while 3606.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.52%
Diluted share change of 0.52% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-50.91%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-79.42%
Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.03%
Negative FCF growth while 3606.HK is at 122.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53805.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 604.88%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
193.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 82.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-14.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 38.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1287.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 1287.21% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
347.63%
OCF/share CAGR of 347.63% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
202.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 202.92% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
314.20%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3606.HK's 522.71%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-1.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is 42.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
148.76%
Positive short-term CAGR while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 57.95%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.59%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.27%
We show growth while 3606.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-10.76%
Negative asset growth while 3606.HK invests at 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.50%
Under 50% of 3606.HK's 5.80%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
26.07%
Debt growth far above 3606.HK's 1.05%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
We expand SG&A while 3606.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.