PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.66%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 2.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
24.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 3.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-226.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-226.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3875.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3833.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3833.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.06%
Share change of 1.06% while 3606.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 3606.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-11.97%
Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 8.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.76%
Negative FCF growth while 3606.HK is at 14.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-14.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 126.59%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
10.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3606.HK's 21.28%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-11.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 8.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-2249.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-932.93%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 124.53%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
6.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 3606.HK's 75.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
16.65%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-645.85%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-245.29%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
445.96%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 290.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
28.11%
Below 50% of 3606.HK's 92.24%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-0.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 18.72%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.76%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 3606.HK stands at 214.25%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.29%
AR growth well above 3606.HK's 3.21%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.89%
We show growth while 3606.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
30.20%
Positive asset growth while 3606.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.39%
We have a declining book value while 3606.HK shows 2.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
50.09%
We have some new debt while 3606.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
435.21%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. 3606.HK's 14.86%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.64%
We expand SG&A while 3606.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.