Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 2.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 9.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Diluted share change of 29.28% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.

Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 45.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3606.HK's 228.15%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 8.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 15.56%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.

Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Inventory growth well above 3606.HK's 3.03%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

Debt growth far above 3606.HK's 7.87%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.