Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 3606.HK stands at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 10.22%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while 3606.HK is at 32.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while 3606.HK is at 42.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 52.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 52.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 52.83%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Dividend growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 4330.73%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.

Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 55.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 3606.HK is at 113.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 119.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 70.02%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 57.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 46.69%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of 3606.HK's 45.90%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.

3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 3606.HK's 30.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 177.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of 3606.HK's 123.15%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.

Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 3606.HK stands at 203.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 52.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Below 50% of 3606.HK's 22.47%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 3606.HK stands at 143.90%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of 3606.HK's 67.21%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.

Below 50% of 3606.HK's 194.18%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.

Inventory growth well above 3606.HK's 1.56%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

Negative asset growth while 3606.HK invests at 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

Debt growth far above 3606.HK's 7.04%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.