PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Negative revenue growth while Auto - Parts median is 4.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.93%
Negative gross profit growth while Auto - Parts median is 3.06%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-38.09%
Negative EBIT growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-38.09%
Negative operating income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-46.61%
Negative net income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-58.14%
Negative EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-58.14%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
27.41%
Share change of 27.41% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
27.49%
Diluted share change of 27.49% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-60.86%
Negative OCF growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-86.70%
Negative FCF growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
60253.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 56.18%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-22.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 35.32%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-3.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 17.51%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
1252.02%
OCF/share CAGR of 1252.02% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
382.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 382.08% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
1336.12%
3Y OCF/share growth of 1336.12% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
334.84%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 102.59% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
115.27%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 35.23%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
911.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 911.33% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
326.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 43.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
52.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 31.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Auto - Parts median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-14.25%
AR shrinking while Auto - Parts median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
19.80%
Inventory growth of 19.80% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-6.28%
Assets shrink while Auto - Parts median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-19.68%
Negative BV/share change while Auto - Parts median is 2.55%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-40.86%
Debt is shrinking while Auto - Parts median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-10.61%
R&D dropping while Auto - Parts median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
1.66%
SG&A growth of 1.66% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.