0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-285.03%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.93%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-114.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
135.43%
Share change of 135.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
135.43%
Diluted share change of 135.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 33.05%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 24.69%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
60.03%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 21.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
65.71%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.02% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
-108.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.54%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
74.18%
3Y OCF/share growth of 74.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
165.46%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 40.24% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
138.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 57.31%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
243.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 23.67%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
344.28%
SG&A growth of 344.28% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.