PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.56%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
9.40%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.14%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
21.32%
EBIT growth of 21.32% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
21.32%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
66.19%
Net income growth of 66.19% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
67.59%
EPS growth of 67.59% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
67.59%
Diluted EPS growth of 67.59% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.74%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.67%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-166.08%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-816.18%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
47933.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 17.88%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
1.19%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
9.55%
3Y revenue/share growth near Consumer Cyclical median of 10.42%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
-4802.15%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-181.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-137.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
387.58%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 19.23% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-73.88%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 14.18%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-43.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.12%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
54.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.59%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
141.46%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 141.46% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
24.83%
AR growth of 24.83% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-12.51%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
21.68%
Asset growth of 21.68% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.64%
BV/share growth of 1.64% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
281.70%
Debt growth of 281.70% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
75.26%
R&D growth of 75.26% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
7.69%
SG&A growth of 7.69% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.