PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Revenue growth of 0.28% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
8.80%
Gross profit growth of 8.80% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
85.33%
EBIT growth of 85.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
85.33%
Operating income growth of 85.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
87.44%
Net income growth of 87.44% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
62.43%
EPS growth of 62.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
62.43%
Diluted EPS growth of 62.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
15.43%
Share change of 15.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
15.37%
Diluted share change of 15.37% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-698.01%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-308.72%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
11795.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 24.14%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-12.09%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.69%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-5.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.26%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-9561.15%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-664.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-1361.38%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
233.13%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 24.57% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
384.15%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 8.27%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-14.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.98%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.37%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
62.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-18.74%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
30.58%
Inventory growth of 30.58% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-2.55%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.59%
BV/share growth of 0.59% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-99.86%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-35.78%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-46.41%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.