PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.61%
Revenue growth of 39.61% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
17.91%
Gross profit growth of 17.91% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
66.33%
EBIT growth of 66.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
66.33%
Operating income growth of 66.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-47.50%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11.19%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-47.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-40.81%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
33.34%
OCF growth of 33.34% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
22.09%
FCF growth of 22.09% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
30.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 39.56%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
-1.91%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.73%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
16.37%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-267.39%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-307.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
34.33%
3Y OCF/share growth of 34.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
135.80%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 70.44% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
97.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 14.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-59.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.25%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
418.24%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 19.96% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
52.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 19.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
23.32%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
AR growth of 2.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-3.93%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.51%
Asset growth of 5.51% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
69.47%
BV/share growth of 69.47% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-22.54%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
97.36%
R&D growth of 97.36% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
9.83%
SG&A growth of 9.83% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.