PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.45%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
283.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
229.63%
EBIT growth of 229.63% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
229.63%
Operating income growth of 229.63% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
183.19%
Net income growth of 183.19% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
171.60%
EPS growth of 171.60% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
171.60%
Diluted EPS growth of 171.60% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
16.23%
Share change of 16.23% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
16.16%
Diluted share change of 16.16% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.02%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-3.95%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-25.20%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.32%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-14.92%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
78.46%
3Y CAGR of 78.46% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-879.87%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-38.06%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-2020.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
618.94%
Net income/share CAGR of 618.94% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
82.63%
Net income/share CAGR of 82.63% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
135.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 135.49% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
109.13%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.66% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-16.14%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.04%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
41.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 41.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-91.69%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.95%
AR growth of 8.95% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-33.37%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-10.25%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.50%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-55.61%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.41%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
71.83%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.