PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.95%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-48.58%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.59%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-122.15%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-122.15%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-112.71%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-111.92%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-111.92%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
5.84%
Share change of 5.84% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
5.85%
Diluted share change of 5.85% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-1.18%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
21.66%
OCF growth of 21.66% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
22.08%
FCF growth of 22.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-40.24%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.34%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-52.05%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.22%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
20.63%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-6853.77%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-29.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-75.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-114.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 9.89%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-118.06%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.79%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-148.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.26%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
90.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 90.48% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-2.50%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.49%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
38.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-24.01%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-60.78%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-60.06%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-20.45%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
6.44%
Inventory growth of 6.44% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.93%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
8.83%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
7.92%
Debt growth of 7.92% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
15.24%
R&D growth of 15.24% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-27.52%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.