PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.16%
Revenue growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 3.41%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
20.10%
Gross profit growth of 20.10% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
8.18%
EBIT growth of 8.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
8.18%
Operating income growth of 8.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
85.09%
Net income growth of 85.09% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
84.38%
EPS growth of 84.38% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
85.94%
Diluted EPS growth of 85.94% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-6.85%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
1.22%
Diluted share change of 1.22% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
6.96%
Dividend growth of 6.96% while Consumer Cyclical median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-10.98%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-15.47%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-35.10%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 20.71%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-46.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.85%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-44.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.82%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-8146.73%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
36.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 36.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-85.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-196.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 0.97%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-102.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-108.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.71%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
88.86%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 24.83% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-3.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.81%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-12.03%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 8.21%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-18.72%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.37%
AR growth of 1.37% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
20.84%
Inventory growth of 20.84% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.58%
Asset growth of 2.58% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5.91%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-3.03%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
146.15%
R&D growth of 146.15% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-18.01%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.