PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.74%
Revenue growth of 0.74% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
44.00%
Gross profit growth of 44.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
175.08%
Positive EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
175.08%
Positive operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
228.07%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
228.28%
Positive EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
228.28%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-99.98%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-63.53%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-57.45%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-51.09%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.90%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
8.87%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-51.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.85%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-2256.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-2477.32%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
5.55%
3Y OCF/share growth of 5.55% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-9.39%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
37.21%
Net income/share CAGR of 37.21% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
153.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
65.53%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 11.41% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
71.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-9.27%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.27%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-99.92%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.99%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
9.71%
AR growth of 9.71% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-1.97%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-6.97%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
6.25%
BV/share growth of 6.25% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-16.11%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-32.73%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-4.50%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.