PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.48%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-23.42%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.04%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-78.76%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.22%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-78.76%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.48%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-98.53%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-98.40%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.16%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-98.40%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.03%
Share change of 0.03% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
457531.89%
Dividend growth of 457531.89% while Consumer Cyclical median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
40.99%
OCF growth of 40.99% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
40.27%
FCF growth of 40.27% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-67.49%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 20.60%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-15.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.73%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-28.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 27.10%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-1697.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-72.92%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
34.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 34.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-98.53%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 10.41%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-96.55%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.11%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
100.61%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 56.81%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
38.18%
Equity/share CAGR of 38.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
39.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
20.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-19.39%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-55.55%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.54%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-10.88%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.46%
Asset growth of 1.46% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.69%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-2.75%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-3.46%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-13.08%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.