0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.24%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 19.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
28.50%
Cost growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 10.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.27%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 87.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.45%
Margin decline while 0259.HK shows 57.46% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
80.16%
R&D change of 80.16% while 0259.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
75.28%
G&A growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 49.86%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
16.79%
Marketing expense growth less than half of 0259.HK's 43.43%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.33%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0259.HK's 193.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
26.27%
Total costs growth less than half of 0259.HK's 55.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.66%
D&A reduction while 0259.HK shows 4.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.07%
EBITDA decline while 0259.HK shows 80.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.60%
EBITDA margin decline while 0259.HK shows 51.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.45%
Operating income decline while 0259.HK shows 243.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.31%
Operating margin decline while 0259.HK shows 188.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
95.15%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of 0259.HK's 159.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
14.16%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 164.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0259.HK shows 122.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.05%
Tax expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 380.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.51%
Net income growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 186.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.16%
Net margin decline while 0259.HK shows 140.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.43%
EPS growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 184.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.43%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 184.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.69%
Share count increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.59%
Diluted share increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.