0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.61%
Positive growth while 0259.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
41.84%
Cost increase while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
17.91%
Positive growth while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-15.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
97.36%
R&D change of 97.36% while 0259.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-5.77%
G&A reduction while 0259.HK shows 10.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
13.50%
Marketing expense growth while 0259.HK reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.95%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0259.HK's 867.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
40.20%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 24.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
237.32%
D&A growth while 0259.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
201.01%
EBITDA growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
115.62%
EBITDA margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.33%
Operating income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.14%
Operating margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.36%
Other expenses growth less than half of 0259.HK's 241.10%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
24.05%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 148.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0259.HK shows 200.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.17%
Tax expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 124.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.50%
Net income decline while 0259.HK shows 132.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.40%
Net margin decline while 0259.HK shows 180.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.19%
EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 130.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.67%
Diluted EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 130.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.81%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.