0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.24%
Revenue decline while 0259.HK shows 6.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-30.71%
Cost reduction while 0259.HK shows 4.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-24.76%
Gross profit decline while 0259.HK shows 20.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.86%
Margin expansion 50-75% of 0259.HK's 13.50%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-67.10%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
2.97%
G&A growth while 0259.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-49.94%
Marketing expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 11.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.59%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-30.02%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.57%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-60.33%
EBITDA decline while 0259.HK shows 27.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.13%
EBITDA margin decline while 0259.HK shows 20.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.87%
Operating income growth 50-75% of 0259.HK's 87.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
110.53%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 76.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-131.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-82.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.37%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-112.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-112.61%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.85%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.05%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.84%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.