0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.95%
Revenue decline while 0259.HK shows 35.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.46%
Cost reduction while 0259.HK shows 27.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-48.58%
Gross profit decline while 0259.HK shows 106.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-30.56%
Margin decline while 0259.HK shows 52.69% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
15.24%
R&D change of 15.24% while 0259.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-15.41%
G&A reduction while 0259.HK shows 16.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-52.43%
Marketing expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 9.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.54%
Operating expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 13.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.33%
Total costs reduction while 0259.HK shows 25.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.39%
D&A growth while 0259.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-68.82%
EBITDA decline while 0259.HK shows 65.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.89%
EBITDA margin decline while 0259.HK shows 22.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-122.15%
Operating income decline while 0259.HK shows 1257.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.92%
Operating margin decline while 0259.HK shows 954.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.99%
Other expenses growth while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-115.23%
Pre-tax income decline while 0259.HK shows 268.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0259.HK shows 171.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
478.53%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 94.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-112.71%
Net income decline while 0259.HK shows 14.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-117.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.92%
EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.92%
Diluted EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.84%
Share count increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.85%
Diluted share increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.