PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.40%
Revenue decline while 0259.HK shows 13.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.29%
Cost reduction while 0259.HK shows 12.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-37.16%
Gross profit decline while 0259.HK shows 20.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-27.43%
Margin decline while 0259.HK shows 6.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-34.23%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
21.81%
Similar G&A growth to 0259.HK's 25.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
-68.62%
Marketing expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 7.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.63%
Operating expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 19.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.55%
Total costs reduction while 0259.HK shows 12.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.34%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 2.18%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-31.99%
EBITDA decline while 0259.HK shows 3.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-160.18%
Operating income decline while 0259.HK shows 23.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.45%
Operating margin decline while 0259.HK shows 8.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.46%
Other expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 154.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3044.58%
Pre-tax income decline while 0259.HK shows 341.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3531.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0259.HK shows 289.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.34%
Tax expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 341.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2470.86%
Net income decline while 0259.HK shows 105.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2868.71%
Net margin decline while 0259.HK shows 81.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2340.00%
EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 106.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2611.11%
Diluted EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.64%
Share count increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.01%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.