0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.52%
Revenue decline while 0335.HK shows 84.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.51%
Cost reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.64%
Gross profit decline while 0335.HK shows 84.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.39%
Margin change of 10.39% while 0335.HK shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-71.23%
R&D reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-1.86%
G&A reduction while 0335.HK shows 10.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
7.26%
Marketing expense change of 7.26% while 0335.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-35.18%
Other expenses reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.05%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0335.HK's 559.94%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.83%
Total costs reduction while 0335.HK shows 559.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.91%
Interest expense reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.39%
D&A growth while 0335.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.84%
EBITDA decline while 0335.HK shows 2881.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.22%
EBITDA margin decline while 0335.HK shows 1605.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.57%
Operating income decline while 0335.HK shows 28.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
74.86%
Other expenses growth less than half of 0335.HK's 7449.32%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-61.35%
Pre-tax income decline while 0335.HK shows 762.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0335.HK shows 366.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.37%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-82.23%
Net income decline while 0335.HK shows 798.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.21%
Net margin decline while 0335.HK shows 386.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.89%
EPS decline while 0335.HK shows 791.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.21%
Diluted EPS decline while 0335.HK shows 791.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.43%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while 0335.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.