0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.49%
Revenue decline while 0335.HK shows 329.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.30%
Cost reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.93%
Gross profit decline while 0335.HK shows 329.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.50%
Margin change of 7.50% while 0335.HK shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-10.61%
R&D reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
7.55%
Similar G&A growth to 0335.HK's 8.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
-10.14%
Marketing expense reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.59%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0335.HK's 243.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-12.02%
Total costs reduction while 0335.HK shows 243.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.44%
D&A growth while 0335.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.01%
EBITDA decline while 0335.HK shows 14118.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.88%
EBITDA margin decline while 0335.HK shows 3367.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.09%
Operating income decline while 0335.HK shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-151.01%
Other expenses reduction while 0335.HK shows 17128.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.54%
Pre-tax income decline while 0335.HK shows 884.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.63%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0335.HK shows 129.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.77%
Tax expense growth less than half of 0335.HK's 59.10%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-46.61%
Net income decline while 0335.HK shows 903.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.98%
Net margin decline while 0335.HK shows 133.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.14%
EPS decline while 0335.HK shows 928.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.14%
Diluted EPS decline while 0335.HK shows 928.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.41%
Share count increase while 0335.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.49%
Diluted share change of 27.49% while 0335.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.