0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.81%
Revenue decline while 0335.HK shows 238.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.27%
Cost reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.70%
Gross profit decline while 0335.HK shows 238.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.81%
Margin decline while 0335.HK shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-34.95%
R&D reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
3.40%
G&A growth less than half of 0335.HK's 29.24%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
18.10%
Marketing expense change of 18.10% while 0335.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.13%
Operating expenses growth while 0335.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.90%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.47%
D&A growth while 0335.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-76.04%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.78%
Operating income decline while 0335.HK shows 496.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.61%
Operating margin decline while 0335.HK shows 76.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.24%
Other expenses growth while 0335.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-74.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.17%
Tax expense reduction while 0335.HK shows 485.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-52.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.23%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.99%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.65%
Share count reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.