0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
69.45%
Positive growth while 0335.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
59.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 2.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
283.79%
Positive growth while 0335.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
126.49%
Margin expansion while 0335.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.41%
R&D reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
61.82%
G&A growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 5.13%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
134.99%
Marketing expense growth while 0335.HK reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.59%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0335.HK's 121.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
58.00%
Total costs growth while 0335.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.13%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1035.91%
EBITDA growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
652.33%
EBITDA margin growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
229.63%
Operating income growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
176.50%
Operating margin growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.28%
Other expenses growth while 0335.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
191.41%
Pre-tax income growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
153.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-85.48%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
183.19%
Income change of 183.19% while 0335.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
149.09%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x 0335.HK's 7.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
171.60%
EPS change of 171.60% while 0335.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
171.60%
Diluted EPS change of 171.60% while 0335.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
16.23%
Share count reduction below 50% of 0335.HK's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
16.16%
Diluted share change of 16.16% while 0335.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.