0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.48%
Revenue decline while 0335.HK shows 21.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.12%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-23.42%
Gross profit decline while 0335.HK shows 21.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.89%
Margin decline while 0335.HK shows 0.03% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.46%
R&D reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
0.26%
G&A growth less than half of 0335.HK's 6.64%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-26.83%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.93%
Operating expenses growth while 0335.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.52%
Total costs reduction while 0335.HK shows 1598.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.12%
D&A growth while 0335.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.59%
EBITDA decline while 0335.HK shows 3327.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.32%
EBITDA margin decline while 0335.HK shows 2718.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.12%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-92.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.32%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-98.53%
Net income decline while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-98.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-98.40%
EPS decline while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-98.40%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count increase while 0335.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% while 0335.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.