0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.84%
Revenue decline while 0335.HK shows 504.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.16%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-32.02%
Gross profit decline while 0335.HK shows 511.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.08%
Margin decline while 0335.HK shows 1.25% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-29.26%
R&D reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-25.37%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-40.65%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.02%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-26.69%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.64%
D&A growth less than half of 0335.HK's 38.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while 0335.HK shows 928.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.86%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of 0335.HK's 237.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-46.07%
Operating income decline while 0335.HK shows 540.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.28%
Operating margin decline while 0335.HK shows 172.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.47%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-64.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.57%
Tax expense reduction while 0335.HK shows 14.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-92.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.68%
Share count reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% while 0335.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.