PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.49%
Revenue decline while 0360.HK shows 3.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.30%
Cost reduction while 0360.HK shows 5.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.93%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.50%
Margin expansion while 0360.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.61%
R&D reduction while 0360.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
7.55%
G&A growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 4.00%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-10.14%
Marketing expense reduction while 0360.HK shows 27.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.59%
Operating expenses growth while 0360.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.02%
Total costs reduction while 0360.HK shows 4.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.44%
D&A growth while 0360.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.01%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-151.01%
Other expenses reduction while 0360.HK shows 301.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.54%
Pre-tax income decline while 0360.HK shows 18.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.63%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0360.HK shows 20.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.77%
Tax expense growth while 0360.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-46.61%
Net income decline while 0360.HK shows 37.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.98%
Net margin decline while 0360.HK shows 39.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.14%
EPS decline while 0360.HK shows 51.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.14%
Diluted EPS decline while 0360.HK shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.41%
Share count reduction below 50% of 0360.HK's 27.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
27.49%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of 0360.HK's 24.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.