PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.40%
Revenue decline while 0376.HK shows 58.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.46%
Cost reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.04%
Gross profit decline while 0376.HK shows 58.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.76%
Margin decline while 0376.HK shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.99%
G&A reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-15.29%
Marketing expense reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.94%
Other expenses growth while 0376.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.08%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.81%
Total costs reduction while 0376.HK shows 165.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.34%
Interest expense growth less than half of 0376.HK's 311.58%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.68%
D&A growth less than half of 0376.HK's 1639.74%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-44.43%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.98%
Other expenses growth while 0376.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.91%
Tax expense reduction while 0376.HK shows 311.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
600.81%
Net income growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
607.91%
Net margin growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
542.31%
EPS growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
542.31%
Diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.62%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x 0376.HK's 287.99%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
12.62%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x 0376.HK's 287.99%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.