0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-29.45%
Revenue decline while 0376.HK shows 11.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.64%
Cost reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-61.53%
Gross profit decline while 0376.HK shows 11.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-45.48%
Margin decline while 0376.HK shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-37.45%
R&D reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-31.14%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-37.33%
Marketing expense reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.63%
Operating expenses reduction while 0376.HK shows 246.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.96%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
333.51%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 5.73%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-1313.55%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1820.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-496.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-745.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
38.64%
Other expenses growth while 0376.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-54.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.19%
Tax expense reduction while 0376.HK shows 2842.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-64.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-132.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
29.22%
Share count increase while 0376.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.28%
Diluted share increase while 0376.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.