0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.84%
Revenue decline while 0376.HK shows 7.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.16%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-32.02%
Gross profit decline while 0376.HK shows 72.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.08%
Margin decline while 0376.HK shows 60.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-29.26%
R&D reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-25.37%
G&A reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-40.65%
Marketing expense reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.02%
Operating expenses reduction while 0376.HK shows 24.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.69%
Total costs reduction while 0376.HK shows 213.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.64%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 0.39%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-7.20%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
26.86%
EBITDA margin growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-46.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.47%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-64.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.57%
Tax expense reduction while 0376.HK shows 61.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-92.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.68%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.00%
Diluted share increase while 0376.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.