0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.61%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x 0425.HK's 9.48%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
41.84%
Cost growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 13.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.91%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x 0425.HK's 0.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-15.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
97.36%
R&D growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 26.97%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-5.77%
G&A reduction while 0425.HK shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
13.50%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of 0425.HK's 20.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.95%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0425.HK's 49.27%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
40.20%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 19.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
237.32%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 19.69%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
201.01%
EBITDA growth while 0425.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
115.62%
EBITDA margin growth while 0425.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.33%
Operating income growth while 0425.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.14%
Operating margin growth while 0425.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.36%
Other expenses growth while 0425.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.05%
Pre-tax income growth while 0425.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.17%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-47.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.19%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.81%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.