0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.69%
Revenue growth 50-75% of 3606.HK's 15.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
6.89%
Cost growth less than half of 3606.HK's 17.21%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
27.08%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x 3606.HK's 13.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.92%
Margin expansion while 3606.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while 3606.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
30.89%
G&A growth while 3606.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
43.85%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 8.32%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-151.50%
Other expenses reduction while 3606.HK shows 507.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
34.20%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 11.21%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.85%
Total costs growth 50-75% of 3606.HK's 15.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
20.78%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 3.33%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
28.59%
D&A growth less than half of 3606.HK's 63.16%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-10.76%
EBITDA decline while 3606.HK shows 17.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.89%
EBITDA margin decline while 3606.HK shows 1.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.39%
Operating income decline while 3606.HK shows 11.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
61.54%
Other expenses growth while 3606.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.43%
Pre-tax income decline while 3606.HK shows 11.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
43.35%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 17.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3008.70%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x 3606.HK's 9.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2760.26%
Net margin growth while 3606.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2827.27%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 3606.HK's 11.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2827.27%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 3606.HK's 11.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.02%
Share count change of 3.02% while 3606.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
3.02%
Diluted share change of 3.02% while 3606.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.