0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.48%
Revenue decline while 3606.HK shows 13.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.12%
Cost reduction while 3606.HK shows 10.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.42%
Gross profit decline while 3606.HK shows 19.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.89%
Margin decline while 3606.HK shows 5.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.46%
R&D reduction while 3606.HK shows 8.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
0.26%
G&A growth while 3606.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-26.83%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.93%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 5.28%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-17.52%
Total costs reduction while 3606.HK shows 9.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.12%
D&A growth less than half of 3606.HK's 3.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-28.59%
EBITDA decline while 3606.HK shows 30.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.32%
EBITDA margin decline while 3606.HK shows 14.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.76%
Operating income decline while 3606.HK shows 98.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.62%
Operating margin decline while 3606.HK shows 75.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-110.12%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-92.56%
Pre-tax income decline while 3606.HK shows 98.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.76%
Pre-tax margin decline while 3606.HK shows 75.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.32%
Tax expense reduction while 3606.HK shows 42.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-98.53%
Net income decline while 3606.HK shows 110.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-98.17%
Net margin decline while 3606.HK shows 85.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-98.40%
EPS decline while 3606.HK shows 111.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-98.40%
Diluted EPS decline while 3606.HK shows 111.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.03%
Share count increase while 3606.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.00%
Diluted share increase while 3606.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.