0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.44%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Auto - Parts median of 1.98%. Guy Spier would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
1.37%
Cost growth near Auto - Parts median of 1.37%. Charlie Munger would verify if industry cost structure is attractive.
1.98%
Gross profit growth 75-90% of Auto - Parts median of 2.33%. John Neff would investigate improvement potential.
0.54%
Margin change of 0.54% versus flat Auto - Parts margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
18.55%
R&D change of 18.55% versus flat Auto - Parts spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
2.28%
G&A change of 2.28% versus flat Auto - Parts overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-46.53%
Marketing expense reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.11%
Operating expenses growth 50-90% of Auto - Parts median of 3.88%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
1.45%
Total costs growth 50-90% of Auto - Parts median of 1.70%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.16%
D&A reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-6.43%
EBITDA decline while Auto - Parts median is -3.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.76%
EBITDA margin decline while Auto - Parts median is -5.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.35%
Operating income decline while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1.76%
Operating margin decline while Auto - Parts median is -0.37%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
73417.48%
Other expenses growth while Auto - Parts reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
337.29%
Pre-tax income growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
331.08%
Pre-tax margin growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
514.70%
Tax expense growth while Auto - Parts reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
2991.74%
Net income growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2947.88%
Net margin growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2880.00%
EPS growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2860.00%
Diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
0.27%
Share count change of 0.27% versus stable Auto - Parts. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.