0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.69%
Growth of 8.69% versus flat Auto - Parts revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
6.89%
Cost growth of 6.89% versus flat Auto - Parts costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
27.08%
Positive growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
16.92%
Margin expansion while Auto - Parts median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
30.89%
G&A change of 30.89% versus flat Auto - Parts overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
43.85%
Marketing expense change of 43.85% versus flat Auto - Parts spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-151.50%
Other expenses reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
34.20%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 0.35%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
8.85%
Total costs change of 8.85% versus flat Auto - Parts costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
20.78%
Interest expense change of 20.78% versus flat Auto - Parts costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
28.59%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 0.26%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-10.76%
EBITDA decline while Auto - Parts median is -2.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.89%
EBITDA margin decline while Auto - Parts median is -5.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.39%
Operating income decline while Auto - Parts median is -1.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-32.28%
Operating margin decline while Auto - Parts median is -3.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
61.54%
Other expenses growth while Auto - Parts reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-14.43%
Pre-tax income decline while Auto - Parts median is -10.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.27%
Pre-tax margin decline while Auto - Parts median is -11.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
43.35%
Tax expense growth while Auto - Parts reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
3008.70%
Net income growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2760.26%
Net margin growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2827.27%
EPS growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2827.27%
Diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
3.02%
Share count change of 3.02% versus stable Auto - Parts. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
3.02%
Diluted share change of 3.02% versus stable Auto - Parts. Walter Schloss would verify approach.