PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.44%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.78%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
1.37%
Cost growth near Consumer Cyclical median of 1.35%. Charlie Munger would verify if industry cost structure is attractive.
1.98%
Growth of 1.98% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.54%
Margin expansion while Consumer Cyclical median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
18.55%
R&D change of 18.55% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
2.28%
G&A change of 2.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-46.53%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.11%
Operating expenses growth 50-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 3.20%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
1.45%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.04%. Guy Spier would scrutinize spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.16%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-6.43%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.76%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -4.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.35%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1.76%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
73417.48%
Other expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
337.29%
Pre-tax income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
331.08%
Pre-tax margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
514.70%
Tax expense growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
2991.74%
Net income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2947.88%
Net margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2880.00%
EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2860.00%
Diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
0.27%
Share count change of 0.27% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.