0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.54%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-12.80%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
39.62%
Margin change of 39.62% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.76%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-153.99%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-77.74%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-81.80%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-10.14%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-71.14%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
94.37%
EBITDA change of 94.37% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
90.99%
Margin change of 90.99% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
92.43%
Income change of 92.43% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
87.88%
Margin change of 87.88% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
11.61%
Other expenses change of 11.61% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
82.52%
Income change of 82.52% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
72.01%
Margin change of 72.01% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
79.14%
Tax expense change of 79.14% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
82.70%
Income change of 82.70% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
72.30%
Margin change of 72.30% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
82.62%
EPS change of 82.62% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
82.62%
Diluted EPS change of 82.62% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.