PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
16.52M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.69%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
6.89%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.47%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
27.08%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
16.92%
Margin change of 16.92% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
30.89%
G&A change of 30.89% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
43.85%
Marketing expense change of 43.85% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-151.50%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
34.20%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.07%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
8.85%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.97%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
20.78%
Interest expense change of 20.78% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
28.59%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.39%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-10.76%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.89%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.39%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-32.28%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
61.54%
Other expenses change of 61.54% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-14.43%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.27%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
43.35%
Tax expense change of 43.35% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
3008.70%
Income change of 3008.70% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2760.26%
Margin change of 2760.26% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2827.27%
EPS change of 2827.27% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2827.27%
Diluted EPS change of 2827.27% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
3.02%
Share count change of 3.02% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
3.02%
Diluted share change of 3.02% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.