PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
16.52M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.53%
Growth of 1.53% versus flat Consumer Cyclical revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
1.47%
Cost growth of 1.47% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
1.99%
Growth of 1.99% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.46%
Margin change of 0.46% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.66%
G&A change of 5.66% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-9.37%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
61.13%
Other expenses change of 61.13% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
3.47%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.26%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
1.65%
Total costs change of 1.65% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-1.69%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
31.15%
D&A change of 31.15% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
8.75%
EBITDA change of 8.75% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.11%
Margin change of 7.11% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-6.80%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.20%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.26%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-9.22%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-45.89%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
7.56%
Income change of 7.56% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
5.95%
Margin change of 5.95% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.45%
EPS change of 7.45% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.45%
Diluted EPS change of 7.45% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.52%
Share count change of 0.52% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.52%
Diluted share change of 0.52% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.