0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.70%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.77%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
16.81%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.38%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.77%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.13%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.80%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
314.74%
R&D change of 314.74% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
7.48%
G&A change of 7.48% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
2.92%
Marketing expense change of 2.92% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
7.36%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.86%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
15.87%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.60%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2.06%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.23%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
47.75%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
26.61%
Margin change of 26.61% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
105.96%
Income change of 105.96% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
76.49%
Margin change of 76.49% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1479.02%
Other expenses change of 1479.02% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
141.00%
Income change of 141.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
106.52%
Margin change of 106.52% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
196.42%
Tax expense change of 196.42% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
322.84%
Income change of 322.84% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
262.33%
Margin change of 262.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
330.00%
EPS change of 330.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
344.83%
Diluted EPS change of 344.83% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-1.33%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-5.02%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.