PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
16.52M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Growth of 0.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
-0.76%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
8.80%
Growth of 8.80% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
8.50%
Margin change of 8.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-35.78%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-60.83%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-8.39%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.58%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.75%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-0.36%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.52%
D&A change of 41.52% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
65.59%
EBITDA change of 65.59% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
65.13%
Margin change of 65.13% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
85.33%
Income change of 85.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
84.82%
Margin change of 84.82% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-230.78%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
59.91%
Pre-tax income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
59.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
124.26%
Tax expense change of 124.26% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
87.44%
Income change of 87.44% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
86.92%
Margin change of 86.92% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
62.43%
EPS change of 62.43% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
62.43%
Diluted EPS change of 62.43% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
15.43%
Share count change of 15.43% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
15.37%
Diluted share change of 15.37% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.