0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
16.52M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.24%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.25%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
28.50%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.67%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.27%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-13.45%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
80.16%
R&D change of 80.16% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
75.28%
G&A change of 75.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
16.79%
Marketing expense change of 16.79% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.33%
Operating expenses change of 5.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
26.27%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.53%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.66%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-6.07%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.85%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.60%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.45%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-24.31%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
95.15%
Other expenses change of 95.15% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
14.16%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-9.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-29.05%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
23.51%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-2.16%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
21.43%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.21%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
21.43%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
1.69%
Share count change of 1.69% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.59%
Diluted share change of 1.59% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.