PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
16.52M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.84%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-6.21%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
17.03%
Growth of 17.03% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
21.71%
Margin change of 21.71% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-25.80%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
46.47%
G&A change of 46.47% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-10.21%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.51%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.47%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-4.47%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-141.98%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-28.65%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.80%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
39.17%
Income change of 39.17% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
44.73%
Margin change of 44.73% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-106.88%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
35.25%
Income change of 35.25% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
40.66%
Margin change of 40.66% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
138.74%
Tax expense change of 138.74% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
12.12%
Income change of 12.12% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
16.60%
Margin change of 16.60% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
13.73%
EPS change of 13.73% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
13.73%
Diluted EPS change of 13.73% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-1.45%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-1.36%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.