PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
16.52M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.54%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
8.45%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.14%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-15.02%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-19.48%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-36.19%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-11.15%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
17.96%
Marketing expense change of 17.96% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.12%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
6.16%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.45%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.11%
D&A change of 177.11% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
1.76%
EBITDA change of 1.76% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-3.58%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-30.53%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-34.18%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
84.75%
Other expenses change of 84.75% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-25.74%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-29.64%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-61.83%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2.50%
Income change of 2.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-2.88%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.99%
EPS change of 0.99% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-4.19%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.44%
Share count change of 1.44% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
7.00%
Diluted share change of 7.00% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.