0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-29.45%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-26.64%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-61.53%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-45.48%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-37.45%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-31.14%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-37.33%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.63%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-27.96%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
333.51%
D&A change of 333.51% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-1313.55%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1820.05%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-496.72%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-745.78%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
38.64%
Other expenses change of 38.64% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-54.36%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-118.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-69.19%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-64.24%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-132.78%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-27.12%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-27.12%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
29.22%
Share count change of 29.22% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
29.28%
Diluted share change of 29.28% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.