PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
69.45%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.44%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
59.63%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.72%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
283.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
126.49%
Margin change of 126.49% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-0.41%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
61.82%
G&A change of 61.82% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
134.99%
Marketing expense change of 134.99% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.59%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 4.42%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
58.00%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.10%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.13%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
1035.91%
EBITDA change of 1035.91% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
652.33%
Margin change of 652.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
229.63%
Income change of 229.63% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
176.50%
Margin change of 176.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
113.28%
Other expenses change of 113.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
191.41%
Income change of 191.41% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
153.95%
Margin change of 153.95% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-85.48%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
183.19%
Income change of 183.19% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
149.09%
Margin change of 149.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
171.60%
EPS change of 171.60% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
171.60%
Diluted EPS change of 171.60% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
16.23%
Share count change of 16.23% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
16.16%
Diluted share change of 16.16% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.