0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.40%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-11.29%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-37.16%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-27.43%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-34.23%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
21.81%
G&A change of 21.81% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-68.62%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.63%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-11.55%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.34%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.36%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-31.99%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.46%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-160.18%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-200.45%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-100.46%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3044.58%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3531.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-76.34%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-2470.86%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2868.71%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2340.00%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2611.11%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
8.64%
Share count change of 8.64% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.