PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
16.52M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.74%
Growth of 0.74% versus flat Consumer Cyclical revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
-1.99%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
44.00%
Growth of 44.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
42.95%
Margin change of 42.95% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-32.73%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-22.56%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
48.40%
Marketing expense change of 48.40% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.03%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-4.17%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.91%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
297.71%
EBITDA growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
294.80%
EBITDA margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
175.08%
Operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
174.53%
Operating margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
36299.11%
Other expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
233.84%
Pre-tax income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
232.86%
Pre-tax margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
540.29%
Tax expense change of 540.29% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
228.07%
Net income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
227.14%
Net margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
228.28%
EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
228.28%
Diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
0.00%
Share count change of 0.00% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.