PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.48%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-19.12%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-23.42%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-4.89%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-3.46%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
0.26%
G&A change of 0.26% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-26.83%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.93%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.61%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-17.52%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.12%
D&A growth near Consumer Cyclical median of 1.13%. Charlie Munger would verify industry norms.
-28.59%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.32%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-78.76%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-73.62%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-110.12%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-92.56%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-90.76%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-74.32%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-98.53%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-98.17%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-98.40%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-98.40%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.03%
Share count change of 0.03% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.