4.76 - 4.81
3.91 - 4.81
500.5K / 774.6K (Avg.)
10.82 | 0.44
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.33%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 0215.HK's 15.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
22.92%
Cost growth less than half of 0215.HK's 104.91%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
14.99%
Positive growth while 0215.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.41%
Operating expenses growth while 0215.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.63%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x 0215.HK's 15.17%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
412.03%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 0215.HK's 6.45%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
82.42%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0215.HK's 8.74%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
44.76%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x 0215.HK's 14.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.34%
EBITDA margin growth while 0215.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.25%
Operating income decline while 0215.HK shows 21.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.31%
Operating margin decline while 0215.HK shows 4.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.69%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.17%
Pre-tax income decline while 0215.HK shows 20.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.93%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0215.HK shows 4.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.76%
Tax expense reduction while 0215.HK shows 10.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.18%
Net income decline while 0215.HK shows 20.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.09%
Net margin decline while 0215.HK shows 3.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
EPS decline while 0215.HK shows 18.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Diluted EPS decline while 0215.HK shows 18.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.54%
Share count reduction below 50% of 0215.HK's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.50%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of 0215.HK's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.